99 problems...part 3: sensitivity, MIC, and the antibiogram
How can the laboratory help me make better choices with
antimicrobials?
Sensitivity
Analysis: What does it mean?
Sensitivity analysis determines how well that organism can
grow in the presence of a particular antimicrobial at varying concentrations in vitro (on the culture plate). But
this is not reality: the bacteria has been removed from the site of infection
(e.g. uterus, lung, skin etc) and conditions have changed. Even if an organism is sensitive to the
antimicrobial tested on the culture plate inside the horse it be unaffected. The
goal of sensitivity analysis is to assess at what concentration of
antimicrobial we would reasonably expect treatment success, and with knowledge
of the conditions at the site of infection, whether is it reasonable to assume
we can achieve that concentration. This
is a judgment call based on our experience and knowledge of biology. The conditions at the site of infection can
render the antimicrobial ineffective, or where a barrier has formed to exposure
e.g. a thick-walled abscess, the antimicrobial may not penetrate to the site of
infection at a sufficient concentration to be effective even though the
organism is deemed sensitive. By
considering how antimicrobials work and how they will distribute, veterinarians
can make the most appropriate treatment choices.
Sensitivity analysis does not consider the ability of the
bacteria to counter the antimicrobial and promote persistence. Some bacteria are able to produce enzymes
which break down antimicrobials they are tested against. These enzymes are not produced in vitro
on a culture plate. Therefore, although
an organism is sensitive to a particular drug on the culture plate, the
organism is resistant at the site of infection.
Identification of the organism will allow suspicion of this ability, and
advanced testing for resistance genes will confirm this ability to resist.
What is MIC?
The Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) is the lowest
concentration of antimicrobial that inhibits visible growth of a specific
organism in vitro. Three results
are given: susceptible (S), resistant (R) and intermediate (I) which can be
considered a grey zone in response making knowledge of the actual conditions
that may exist where the organism resides in the animal very important. It is not possible to compare the MIC of one
agent to another for a particular bacteria, that is, an MIC for one antimicrobial
of 2ug/ml and another of 1ug/ml for that bacteria does not mean one is twice as
effective the other. This just means
that the concentration that will inhibit the growth of that particular organism
is different. You must achieve that
concentration at the site of infection to be effective, which is where knowing
both your patient and the intended treatment is so important.
Using an Antibiogram
This information is gained from collating antimicrobial
sensitivity information of cultured bacteria derived from submitted diagnostic
samples over a period of time from a laboratory. Results are regional and/or practice-area
specific and should be regularly updated to maintain relevance. This information is useful when making
treatment decisions once the organism has been identified, but sensitivity
analysis is not yet available.
Veterinarians can assess the likelihood of sensitivity of cultured
microorganisms to a particular antimicrobial using local knowledge derived from
organisms cultured from infected sites in horses within the catchment of the
laboratory. Remember this is an in
vitro system and as such may not reflect the ability of the organism to
produce resistance compounds.
In the ongoing war between the biology of survival and control of disease you can never have too many friends or know too much.
Comments
Post a Comment